Fintech
Financial software is held to an availability target and an audit standard at the same time. We build for both, and treat the reconciliation model as a design input rather than a reporting afterthought.
What makes this sector hard
Every one of these has cost somebody a programme. They are the questions we ask first, before any architecture is proposed.
- Regulatory reporting and data residency obligations that constrain architecture
- Reconciliation that has to be provable, not merely probable
- Peak-load behaviour on settlement days that dwarfs the daily average
- Third-party integrations whose availability you do not control
- Access control and audit trails granular enough for an external review
- Settlement that reconciles to the transaction, with the evidence retained
- Peak-day capacity proven by load test before the peak day
- An audit trail that answers the regulator's question without a data project
What we build for fintech
The approach, in practice
The hard part of financial software is rarely the transaction. It is what happens when a transaction is attempted twice, or half-completes against a third party that has gone quiet. We design the idempotency and reconciliation model before the first endpoint, so the awkward cases have a defined answer rather than an incident report.
What we work in for this sector
Named where we hold direct, current experience.
Where else we work
Mining & Metal
E-Mobility & Smart Energy
Automotive
Renewable Energy
Medical
Real Estate
EduTech
Agritech
Smart Logistics
Working in fintech?
Tell us the constraint you are up against. We will tell you what we would do first.